The TEXPERS Blog

The U.S. yield curve inverted. Time to worry?

By Erin Bigley & Scott Krauthamer, Contributors

What drove down U.S. stocks in late December? The answer may be the U.S. bond market and what the shape of the yield curve is—or isn’t—telling us about the state of the economy.

For most of 2018, the U.S. yield curve has been flattening. This happens when the gap between short- and longer-dated yields narrows, historically a sign that economic growth may be slowing.

On Dec. 25, a section of the curve briefly inverted, with the yield on the five-year U.S Treasury note falling slightly below that on the two-year note. That helped spark a 3.2% decline in the S&P 500.

The more closely watched gap between the two- and 10-year notes was hovering at just 12 basis points, its narrowest gap since 2007. An inversion of that section of the curve, with 10-year yields falling below two-year yields, has preceded every recession since the mid-1970s. So it’s understandable why flattening yield curves cause investors to pay attention.

Current circumstances have only heightened investor concerns. The U.S. is in one of its longest macroeconomic expansions in post-war history, and investors are growing increasingly wary that it may end soon. U.S. growth has probably peaked this year and is expected to slow in 2019.

Meanwhile, increasing labor costs are pushing up inflation, triggering concerns that additional interest-rate hikes from the Federal Reserve could soon put an end to the current economic cycle.

Does Yield-Curve Inversion Guarantee a Recession?

Here’s something to keep in mind, though. While the U.S. has never had a recession that wasn’t preceded by an inverted yield curve, not every curve inversion has been followed by a recession.

As the following display shows, during the five mild inversions of the yield curve between 1986 and 2001, the U.S. stock market returned an average of 15% in the three years following the flip, starting the month the inversion occurred. Those inversions were not followed by recession. And when the curve inverted in July 2006, it took two years for the equity market to correct.

Click image to enlarge.

There’s reason to think the yield-curve signal may be distorted this time around. Typically, a flattening curve indicates that monetary policy is too tight. In other words, short-term rates have risen too high for the economy to handle without going into recession.

But adjusted for inflation, the “real” short-term interest rate today is still below 0%. While it’s reasonable to expect rates to peak at much lower levels this cycle than in the past, it doesn’t seem likely that 0% is too much for the economy to handle.

Remember, an inverted yield curve doesn’t cause a recession. It reflects conditions that can trigger one. And if they don’t see those conditions in other places, it’s not unreasonable for policymakers and investors to treat the yield-curve signal with some degree of skepticism.

If Monetary Policy Isn’t to Blame, What Is?

So, if the yield curve isn’t signaling too-tight money, why is it flattening?

We think it’s partly because quantitative easing has distorted the long end of the curve. The Fed’s balance sheet may be shrinking, but it’s still many times its size in past cycles. And the effect of QE programs in other countries has probably boosted demand for U.S. Treasuries, which helps to keep a lid on yields.

What’s more, falling oil prices have helped to temper inflation and growth expectations over the last two months.

What to Expect in 2019

There are plenty of clouds hovering over the outlook for the U.S. and global economies. These include ongoing trade disputes, rising inflation and tighter financial conditions.

But while we expect the pace of U.S. growth to slow next year, we’re not forecasting a recession. On the contrary, we expect a solid 2% growth rate in 2019. Strong hiring puts upward pressure on wages and costs, but it also leads to more consumption, a key engine of the U.S. economy.

In addition, household savings and balance sheets are at their healthiest levels in two decades.

U.S. corporate earnings will probably decelerate in 2019 as the “sugar rush” associated with corporate tax reform starts to fade. The broad reduction in corporate tax rates in 2018 led to an estimated earnings-per-share growth of about 24%. But even with corporate margins possibly peaking, we’re not ready to write off positive earnings growth in 2019.

Of course, with growth slowing and uncertainty rising, markets will remain volatile. But we think the de-risking we’ve seen this year may create some attractive opportunities for active investors.

The views expressed herein do not constitute research, investment advice or trade recommendations and do not necessarily represent the views of all AB portfolio-management teams or TEXPERS.

About the Authors

Erin Bigley

Erin Bigley is a senior investment strategist for the Fixed Income team at AB. She is a member of the firm's Responsible Investment Committee as well as the Municipal Impact Investment Policy Group. She joined the firm in 1997 and previously served as a portfolio manager and trader for the global and Canadian bond strategies. Bigley also spent two years based in London as the global head of Fixed Income business development for institutional clients. She is the coauthor of "LDI: Reducing Downside Risk with Global Bonds," published in The Journal of Investing. 

Scott Krauthamer

Scott Krauthamer is managing director of AB's Equity Business Development team at AB. He oversees global product management and strategy efforts for the firm's equity platform. Prior to joining AB, Krauthamer held a variety of investment, executive management and business strategy roles at Legg Mason, U.S. Trust, Bank of America and J.P. Morgan Private Bank. He started his career as an analyst at J.P. Morgan in 1998, and his financial services experience spans investment-management, quantitative analysis, marketing and business development.