Market rout may spur rotation from growth to value
Photo: Pixabay.com/nattanan23 |
By Charles Roth, Guest Columnist
The early-October 2018
selloff in stocks has fueled speculation about an incipient rotation from
growth to value. After a decade of growth stocks beating asset-heavy, stable
earners and cyclical industrials, perhaps it’s time for a rebound in value. Recent
exchange-traded fund flows and value vs. growth index returns suggest a shift
in investor sentiment.
Since 2008, the
S&P 500 Index has returned an annualized 14%, driven largely by large-cap
growth. Corrections should be expected and welcomed. They create better price
values for risk assets. Value can be assessed at the individual security or
index levels, though we think it’s easier at the security level. Correctly
timing index mean reversions is extraordinarily hard. It can look easy in hindsight,
but head-fakes abound.
Take the Russell 1000
Value Index (RLV) relative to the Russell 1000 Growth Index (RLG), and the
inverse RLG/RLV ratio. The mean reversions appear clear: as the Federal funds
rate and the 10-year Treasury yield zig-zagged down from 1981 to 2008, value
outperformed growth point-to-point. Over those nearly three decades, though,
value outperformed in the first 10 years, then mostly lagged in the prelude to
the Tech bubble. After that burst, value resumed beating growth until just
before the Financial Crisis.
From the bottom of
the Financial Crisis, growth then shifted into overdrive. It was fueled partly
by unprecedented monetary policy: a ground-level benchmark rate and central
bank asset purchases, which kept long-term rates at lowly levels for years to come.
Until, perhaps, this fall, when the U.S. 10-year Treasury yield jumped about 40
basis points to around 3.20%. From September 11 to October 10, 2018, the
Russell 1000 Value and S&P 500 Value indices both beat their growth
counterparts by well over three percentage points.
Click chart to see enlarged image. |
So declining Treasury
yields combined with falling household savings created tailwinds for expanding
consumption that boosted industrials, staples and infrastructure companies. But
the Financial Crisis then induced consumer deleveraging. And tech’s intangible
assets—intellectual property and patents—in many ways became more valuable than
the fixed assets of old economy companies.
That’s
reflected in index restructurings. The S&P Dow Jones and MSCI recently
replaced the old telecommunications sector with a new “Communications Services”
sector.
A
quarter-century ago, the telecommunications sector was 9% of the S&P 500
Index, but by the end of August it had dwindled to less than 2%. Meanwhile,
information technology’s weighting went from 6% to 26%, not including tech
giants Amazon and Netflix, which were classified as consumer discretionary. Tech behemoths are now divided into three separate
sectors. Big firms that own telecom and cable “pipes” are trying to leverage them
with more valuable media and content offerings. The new communications services
sector is 10% of the index.
Now, as rates rise
valuations matter more. Whether
growth or value stocks, if a company’s share price significantly diverges from
its business fundamentals, opportunities to buy or sell are created. We think
these are easier to spot than true index mean reversions.
The
views expressed herein do not constitute research, investment advice or trade
recommendations and do not necessarily represent the views of Thornburg
Investment Management or TEXPERS.
Charles Roth |
About the Author:
Charles Roth is global markets editor for Thornburg Investment Management. Prior to joining Thornburg in 2013, he was an assistant managing editor at Dow Jones Newswires, the Wall Street Journal’s real-time financial news and analysis division, where he oversaw its bureaus in Latin America as well as the New York–based emerging markets group. He previously served as a senior writer in the emerging markets group, bureau chief in Venezuela, and staff reporter in Malaysia. Roth earned a bachelor's degrees from the University of Colorado at Boulder and an masters' degree from the Instituto Universitario de Desarrollo y CooperaciĆ³n at the Universidad Complutense in Madrid, Spain. He was a Peace Corps volunteer in Mali.
No comments:
Post a Comment